First lady Michelle Obama told reporters Wednesday that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid doesn’t owe her an apology over his racial comments about her husband’s electoral chances because she knows Reid so well.
“Harry Reid has no need to apologize to me because I know Harry Reid. I measure people more so on what they do rather than the things they say,” said Obama, in a roundtable with several media outlets, including POLITICO.
On Reid, Michelle Obama seemed interested in closing the book, much as the president had when he accepted Reid’s apologies for the “unfortunate” comments. Reid had said that Obama's presidential candidacy was viable because he is "light skinned" and has no "Negro dialect, unless he wants to."
In the wide-ranging interview, Michelle Obama discussed her upcoming campaign to curb childhood obesity and life in the White House, saying she’s proud that "my kids are sane."
"I'm happy that when I look at my daughters, I recognize them as the kids that they were before we got here," Obama said of her daughters Sasha and Malia.
She also discussed the Nov. 24 state dinner where three alleged party-crashers got in, including two who met President Barack Obama. Michelle Obama downplayed the incident, which raised serious concerns about White House security and Secret Service practices, calling it a “footnote” to a successful night.
“The state dinner was an outstanding success, you know, it’s just the follow-up after it. I look at the reporting on the state dinner, and go, ‘Is that all that happened really? It was so wonderful and so well orchestrated. For me the other stuff that everyone is talking about is a footnote.”
The party-crashing incident also cast a harsh light on social secretary Desiree Rogers, whose office failed to post someone at the entrance gate. But asked about Rogers in the interview, Obama seemed to defend her friend from Chicago, without mentioning her by name.
“Our interaction around security has been outstanding. The White House and Secret Service are working to make sure that processes are in place so it never happens again.”
And, she added in an apparent reference to Rogers, “When I say White House, I mean everyone in the White House.”
Procedures have changed since the security breach that apparently allowed three uninvited guests into the White House, and the Secret Service is still investigating the incident.
Looking ahead to 2010, Obama said she will use her platform to fight childhood obesity, saying she hopes combating the problem will be an important part of her legacy. Her foray into policy marks the first time Obama has led an administrative-wide program, though she said her first year has been about "laying a foundation for a whole set of initiatives."
The initiative will include speeches and travel and Obama said she would be interested in taking her case to Congress if that would be helpful.
"People are receptive because we are talking about kids," she said.
Next week she will address the Conference of Mayors on the topic and in February officially kick off her work around childhood obesity issues, which is a natural outgrowth of the “kitchen garden” on the White House grounds. Congress will take up school-lunch legislation that could increase funding and food safety and eliminate junk food and trans-fats from menus.
"The garden and this first year was really a good way to begin that conversation in a non-threatening way to feel the pulse of the nation, about how do we talk about this in a way that doesn't make already over-stressed parents feel even more guilty about a very hard thing to do, which is making sure your kids eat right every day," Obama said.
Some first lady observers have said that Obama's approach to issues have been scatter-shot rather than focused and as a result, possibly blunting her impact. In the last year she has given a handful of speeches on healthcare, joined with Jill Biden in highlighting the needs of military families, advocated for healthy living, kicked off a mentoring program, and transformed the White House into a showcase for culture, acting as a kind of unofficial arts czar.
On Thursday, she will continue her thank-you tour of agencies, delivering remarks to Labor Department employees and reading to children.
Her signature event has been planting the garden on the White House lawn with a group of elementary school children. Now she hopes her fight against childhood obesity will help her leave her mark.
"I want to leave something behind that you can say because of this time that this person spent here this has changed and we hope that's going to be in the area of childhood obesity," she said.
Source:politico.com/
Showing posts with label Michigan balks Obama. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Michigan balks Obama. Show all posts
Sunday, January 17, 2010
Lynn Sweet on 'Upfront with Tony Cox': Michelle Obama's Inaugural Year
Politics Daily columnist and Daily FLOTUS writer Lynn Sweet appeared on the "UpFront with Tony Cox" radio program on Saturday to discuss the visit that she and a small group of reporters had with Michelle Obama at the White House this week and what the First Lady had to say about her inaugural year.
Wednesday, January 6, 2010
Michigan balks at Obama's stance in Asian carp fight

Chicago
Michigan has reacted angrily to the Obama administration's decision to back Illinois – the president's home state – in a lawsuit about how to stop Asian carp from infesting the Great Lakes.
On Tuesday, US Solicitor General Elena Kagan asked the US Supreme Court to reject Michigan's lawsuit against Illinois. The lawsuit calls for the closure of two Chicago locks on a key commercial canal that connects Lake Michigan to the Mississippi River.
On Wednesday, Michigan Attorney General Mike Cox asked for an immediate meeting with Obama and Michigan congressional leaders to discuss the matter. He said in a public statement he “is extremely disappointed by President Obama's choice to protect the narrow interests of his home state.”
Mr. Cox says that the invasive species will put at risk $7 billion in annual revenue from Great Lakes recreational and commercial fishing and tourism.
Illinois State Attorney Lisa Madigan countered the suggestion that presidential favoritism was involved, saying by phone Wednesday that the allegaton "sounds like politics to me, that doesn’t sound substantive.”
Legal apples to oranges?
The Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal is a historic waterway built in the 1920s to divert sewage away from Chicago. The Michigan lawsuit – which is supported by Minnesota, Wisconsin, New York, Ohio, and the Canadian province of Ontario – is based on complaints made in the 1920s that charge the canal’s unnatural diversion of water away from Lake Michigan is illegal and should be shut down. The Supreme Court declared the canal unlawful, but on four separate occasions it sought only to regulate the canal, not close it.
That fact makes the Michigan challenge moot, Ms. Madigan says. The original decree on which the lawsuit is based because it relates to sanitary issues, not Asian carp.
“It’s apples and oranges, they’re two completely separate issues,” she says.
Madigan adds that Illinois “is committed to do everything [it] can to prevent Asian Carp from getting into Lake Michigan.”
For example, it actively monitors the canal for waterways and will perform fish kills as it did in early December when carp DNA was discovered, she says.
Lost: $30 million in revenue
Lock closures would be detrimental to the state for many reasons, including commerce, she adds. The channel generates $30 million in annual revenue, according to the American Waterways Operators, a trade association representing the tugboat, towboat, and barge industry. The canal also serves as a transportation channel for safety efforts in downtown Chicago and it redirects sewage that protects the lakeside ecosystem, Madigan adds.
“There are very significant economic, safety and environmental impacts that were not taken into account by Michigan,” she says. “We don’t want the carp in the lake either but shutting down the locks at this point could be incredibly detrimental to the state.”
The Asian carp is a bottom feeder presumed to have entered the Chicago canal from a journey begun in Mississippi or Arkansas, where the fish was first introduced to help control algae growth on catfish farms in the 1970s. The discovery of a single fish in the canal in early December raised alarms in surrounding states. The fish had never been found so far north.
The US Supreme Court is scheduled to address the filings Friday.
Source:csmonitor.com/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
